fbpx

Tunic Publisher Claims TikTok Conducted Unapproved ‘Racist, Sexist’ AI Advertisements for Its Game

Tunic Publisher Claims TikTok Conducted Unapproved 'Racist, Sexist' AI Advertisements for Its Game

TikTok’s AI Quandary: Indie Game Developer Finji’s Struggle

The Core Issue

Indie developer and publisher Finji, recognized for hit titles like Night in the Woods and Tunic, has voiced significant apprehensions about TikTok’s application of generative AI to modify its advertisements without permission. This matter surfaced when followers of Finji’s official TikTok handle alerted the company to modified ads showcasing inappropriate portrayals of game characters.

The Claims

Finji claims that TikTok modified one of its advertisements to present a “racist, sexualized” image of a character from its game Usual June. Even with AI features disabled in their ad settings, Finji’s CEO, Rebekah Saltsman, received screenshots of these altered ads, leading her to request an investigation from TikTok.

TikTok’s Reaction

At first, TikTok rejected any involvement of AI-generated assets or slideshow formats in Finji’s advertisements. However, following Finji’s submission of evidence, TikTok recognized the problem and escalated it within the organization. TikTok’s advertising platform includes “Smart Creative” and “Automate Creative” functionalities that utilize AI to enhance ads, but Finji had these features turned off.

The Consequences for Finji

The unauthorized alterations caused both commercial and reputational damage to Finji. TikTok conceded that the ad “raises significant issues, including the unauthorized use of AI, the sexualization and misrepresentation of your characters.” Nonetheless, TikTok’s explanation concentrated on the advantages of its “catalog ads format,” which Finji inadvertently opted into, rather than directly addressing the damaging content.

The Wider Implications

This occurrence underscores the potential dangers of AI in digital advertising, particularly concerning unauthorized alterations to content. It prompts inquiries regarding the transparency and control that advertisers possess over their material on platforms like TikTok.

Conclusion

The conflict between Finji and TikTok highlights the necessity for clearer communication and authority over AI-driven ad adjustments. As AI continues to have a prominent role in digital marketing, platforms must guarantee that advertisers maintain full control and understanding of how their content is utilized and altered.

Q&A Segment

Q1: What led Finji to probe into TikTok’s ad modifications?

A1: Finji was notified by followers of its official TikTok account about altered ads that featured inappropriate representations of its game characters.

Q2: What capabilities does TikTok provide that involve AI in ad creation?

A2: TikTok provides “Smart Creative” and “Automate Creative” options that leverage AI to modify and enhance ads for improved audience interaction.

Q3: What was TikTok’s initial response to Finji’s concerns?

A3: TikTok initially denied any use of AI-generated assets in Finji’s advertisements but later acknowledged the issue after Finji provided evidence.

Q4: What effects did the altered ads have on Finji?

A4: The unauthorized changes resulted in both commercial and reputational harm to Finji due to the inappropriate representation of its game characters.

Q5: What larger implications does this situation present for digital advertising?

A5: The situation emphasizes the need for transparency and control over AI-driven ad modifications to avoid unauthorized and damaging content changes.